Category: Poltical

  • The Great Schism

    Society feels the shift.

    The great schism has occurred. The people of this nation have separated into factions on either side of the political aisle, aligning with red team or blue team, over the death of Charlie Kirk. A tangible shift has been felt as the vibration of this realm has changed.

    Nobody is quite sure yet which fuse has been lit, or how long the fuse is, but everyone can feel it. As the shooting occurred, Liberal political supporters were on film in those exact moments celebrating the shot that took his life.

    Immediately after, videos surfaced of dancing, singing and taunting about the assassination of a man exercising free speech. T-shirts mocking the assassination have been created.

    Books about the assassination were for sale the day of the assassination on Amazon.

    These books have since been removed. This is not a generated image – this was captured live. The minimum time it takes to self publish a book on Amazon is 72 hours. How is this possible? It adds to the mystery.

    The celebrations mocking Charlie Kirk’s death are symbolic of an outright attack on free speech. We are discussing a man who represents an idea: the right to discuss topics openly without violence.

    His history of debating political ideas was inherently peaceful. Never was he recorded slandering, insulting, calling names or the like; however, his opponents embodied the spirit of these forms of hate speech.

    Interestingly enough, those who are cheering his death are saying he was a misogynist, that he deserved it, that he spewed nothing but hate speech – ironically, while spewing hate speech consistently.

    This matter is nothing to do with politics, though it may be cloaked in it. The sequestered free speech represents one thing: an attack on freedom.

    The fact that one side of the aisle has taken it upon them selves to cheer on the fact that violence has taken place against open discourse reveals the agenda of the political left in a light most have never been able to see before: authoritarian totality.

    Fascism does not dress in drab in 2025, it is cloaked in smiley faces and rainbow flags. Liberal fascism is a disease of hate and anger toward an unknown enemy. The discontent in society has created an environment where those who do not understand what they are living in will attack those who are able to articulate it.

    Reading books and expressing logical thought in 2025 makes one a target for hate and violence. To discover this, one need not go further than any social media platform and do a quick search about the fundamental ideas of liberalism. The political left supporters have created the personality of godlessness and embody the an energy that luciferian authorities would blush over.

    This form of hate has been tolerated for many years. The political right has allowed the political left to hang their rainbow flags, allow grown men the right to walk around Walmart in see-through dresses wearing women’s underwear, and even allowed some influence over the programming the children receive “in the name of equality”. However, this celebration of the attack on freedom has pushed the political right past acceptance.

    This specific situation has created a political divide which may never recover. The political left has projected how they have been disenfranchised, excluded, abused and hated for so long; all while being tolerated. A society creating problems which do not exist are a result of excess comfort.

    The political right will likely cease tolerance from this moment on, which will accelerate the collapse of this nation. The projections of the political left will likely now come to fruition. Feelings of the political right to date have been reasonable and accepting. Though the blue team likes to advertise how it has been hated and excluded, the red team has mostly ignored and allowed them to do as they wish over the course of that same time.

    We have now reached a point where the red team will likely start treating the blue team as they have been projecting they have been treated. Most violent shootings in 2025 have occurred on behalf of the Liberal left, specifically the transvestite community. The lasting mental effects of hormonal tampering can not be under stated. Various and countless studies reviewing the effects of hormonal tampering and genital mutilation have surfaced to prove these points. One must simply spend an afternoon seeking the information if one is confused.

    Where before, many people would allow rainbow fascist flags and behaviors in public, the likely hood of that ceasing moving forward is much higher than it was prior to the death of Charlie Kirk.

    Tolerance of hate covered in rainbows and smiley faces is coming to an abrupt end – nobody knows what the end of this will look like. One can theorize that the response, in this light, will lead to a further disenfranchisement of those who have been self-disenfranchised to fit the narrative. By further segregating the liberal left from working society, it is easy to see how violence will likely follow.

    No good will come from what has happened here. If one is to look at the situation objectively, it becomes clear; this is a concerted effort.

    This nation we live in has been under attack since inception. Central banks have, through history, and for centuries, played this same playbook on repeat globally. Central banking survives and thrives off of societal discontent. A nation at war with anyone, especially itself, creates an opportunity for a central bank to increase its profits off the deaths of the population.

    Everything we live in is manufactured. What we are experiencing is the result of a century of central banking since the establishment of the Federal Reserve. The beast has only grown over the last 112 years, and until the People understand this, it will only continue to grow.

    The most prominent political figures are now online attempting to incite a political war – and the political establishment, legal establishment, and central banking cartels need this to happen or they will lose all control of this country. By giving in to these emotions and reacting in this way, the establishment will get what it wants.

    War will result in 2 things certainly:

    1. Unnecessary deaths of our fellow human.
    2. Central Banks win

    Shouting into the aether about this seems to do no good, and in the experience of this writer, results in sequestering of speech. Ultimately the fact remains – until the People take the power away from the “authority”, the authority will remain in power.

    The elitist political system, legal system and corporate complex that rules over the world today is empowered by fiat currency issued by central banks. Every currency unit is a promise to pay – a debt based negotiable instrument – a debt which can not be repaid.

    For as long as we continue to live in this system, the ruling class is only able to maintain and amplify its false power. The results of this stretch further than we can imagine, including inflation and beyond. It is no accident that most average working people are stuck in their same positions, unable to travel or experience the beautiful world we have been put it.

    This world is being run by satanists; a mafia cartel in the form of a political establishment. Every move made by the state is intentional, planned and carefully considered. The playbook of the New World Order was created in 1963 from a report compiled in Iron Mountain, and it is playing out beautifully.

    The People – in general – are too tired, too busy and too uneducated to focus on matters that extend past the average work day and consumption habits. The biggest threat to the state is the man who reads.

    The downfall of the system is education, which is why the global education system is shaped the way it is. Debt issued funding has secured their foothold in every aspect of our society.

    Until We the People take away their debt based fiat currency, they will remain in their positions of power over us.

    Giving them a war is what they want – if we go to war, they win.

  • Choosing the Winners

    The specialty of a central bank is choosing the winners and losers of society.

    Any time a central party controls issuance of the monetary unit in a society, that central party has absolute and maximum control over which forces win and which forces lose in said society. Success for any given entity is simply a “favor” away.

    Aligning incentives is the key to growth in any economy, and the incentives in any financialized economy will be fueled by capital and profit.

    This rings true in both a fiat currency economy and a sound money economy; business will pursue whatever means necessary to accrue the monetary unit.

    The difference between a fiat economy and a sound money economy are fundamental: in a sound money economy, you must earn the profits, while in a fiat economy, you must be in favor of those who create the currency units.

    When central banks have the ability to create money from any signature, those banks hold all “value”. When the government of a country relies on the same central bank to fund it’s directives, moral hazard exists by way of political and corporate contracts. It is not trivial to understand how a centrally issued currency may effect the legal code in any country in favor of the establishment and away from the favor of the population.

    For example: a business selling cheese burgers begins operations early on in a free market. As other businesses begin to open with a similar profit model, the first established business is able to rely on it’s previous connections to help build a “regulatory moat”.

    Burger business #1 is able to call in favors, of which include established banking and business lines. When Burger business #1 makes “good friends” with the bank, the bank is able to be swayed by the opinion of Burger business #1.

    It is in the best interest of Burger business #1 to construct a fictional moat around its business to protect its profits: it may tell the banker friend “you know, I could make more profit if Burger business #2 wasn’t able to join the market as competition”. By two “friends” conspiring about the potential success of Burger business #1 and how it may protect its profits against competition, the bank is incentivized to “bump elbows” with its legal partners in a way to increase regulations on starting any form of Burger business moving forward.

    When the attorney gets wind of the potential successes and legal violations that will take place after passing certain statutes, acts, ordinances and codes, the attorney is incentivized against the aspiring entrepreneur. The attorney is now motivated to create such legal code – of which are presented to potentially influential political partners in their closest circle.

    When a politician is presented with a new legal code drafted by the attorney at the request of the central bank, the central bank may be motivated to “toss a couple bucks” at the politician to assist with passage of a newly-written legal code that would increase regulatory requirements and inhibit a new business from popping up, which would potentially create competition for Burger business #1.

    When the new legal code is passed by way of legislation vote, it is now official rule: anyone aspiring to create a burger business now must abide by newly created legal code – drafted by incentive and based from nothing. This puts any existing Burger businesses in a position of readjustment to comply with new regulation, potentially pricing out smaller businesses that may not have the same profit margin as larger ones.

    This also creates a barrier to entry for anyone who would wish to open their own Burger business: legal requirements, registration fees, taxes, compliance costs etcetera can present too much of a barrier for a new market participant to be able to join the market.

    This creates an environment that reflects what you might see today: every city has the same Burger businesses, more or less, and custom, smaller shops are forced to close down or not be able to stay in business due to the costs of compliance. Higher compliance cost = higher customer prices and not one thing else.

    This structure erases free market competition, extorts earnings from existing businesses and prevents new businesses from starting, which would afford more variety and further price competition among goods.

    Central banking is the crux of the whole issue: without the central bank issuing a currency and creating “money” from a signature on a page: none of the scenario described could take place. Of course, it is more nuanced than what is outlined, but these are the basics of how central banking interacts with the government and what the outcomes may look like.

    For entertainment purposes only, of course.

  • Fascism

    Mirriam-Webster Dictionary Definition:

    Fascism: a populist political philosophy, movement, or regime (such as that of the Fascisti) that exalts nation and often race above the individual, that is associated with a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader, and that is characterized by severe economic and social regimentation and by forcible suppression of opposition

    Google search definition

    Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, and ultranationalist political ideology and movement that rose to prominence in early-20th-century Europe. It is characterized by a dictatorial leader, centralized autocracy, militarism, forcible suppression of opposition, belief in a natural social hierarchy, subordination of individual interests for the perceived interest of the nation or race, and strong regimentation of society and the economy.

    Reviewing the provided definitions of Fascism from above reveal an interested consideration – bias vs unbias.

    When contemplating what type of society we live in, many uneducated minds tend to drift toward the idea that fascism is a far-right authoritarian idea. Basic logic dictates that fascism knows no party, but is an objective ideology. It could be considered an interesting discovery to notice that popular search engines and social media outlets frame fascism as a “left vs right” topic.

    We certainly know from reading books that fascism has absolutely nothing to do with “right vs left” in an arbitrary political sense, and everything to do with totalitarian authoritative control over a population. As “For the Posterity” has no political stance or motives and operates without bias, let us break down what the Mirriam-Webster definition is:

    “…populist…” – is considered to be a political stance that prioritizes “the common people” in opposition to a perceived elite or ruling class.

    “…movement that exalts a nation…” – to raise in rank, character or status; elevate. To glorify, praise, or honor. To increase the effect or intensity of; heighten.

    “…and often race above the individual…” – often being the operative word here – to maintain a populist ideology does not include race-based ideas.

    “…that is associated with a centralized autocratic government headed by a dictatorial leader…” Autocracy is a form of government in which absolute power is held by one person, known as an autocrat. 

    As the United States Corporation has the ability to pass executive orders under “emergency war time powers” and has been passing executive orders in increasing amounts, would this not qualify as “autocratic” under objective review? The first Executive Order was passed on April 15th, 1861 by Abraham Lincoln as a proclamation mobilizing troops during Civil War which included the suspension of habeas corpus – Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the constitution to present a prisoner and defend against unlawful imprisonment.

    The next Executive Order was put into effect on February 5th 1917 by Woodrow Wilson for shipping control during World War I, which was presented as the first formal national emergency proclamation. This was due to poor political planning which resulting in the full reliance of foreign shipping freight to fuel the war efforts of the United States.

    March 6th 1933, Franklin Roosevelt signed EO 6102 that made the possession of gold unlawful, demanding the People trade their physical gold for fiat currency or face imprisonment. This stemmed from central bank money printing and a synthetic bust caused by rehypothecation of depositor funds.

    Every executive order in effect has enabled the government to encroach on the freedoms and decisions of the people who are being governed, slowly, certainly and repeatedly.

    Executive orders, as unilateral directives issued by the executive branch, can infringe upon the freedoms of the population by circumventing legislative oversight and enabling the concentration of power in a single authority. This aligns with authoritarian or autocratic ideologies that prioritize centralized control over “democratic” processes. In such frameworks, these orders may impose restrictions on civil liberties—such as freedom of speech, assembly, or movement—without the deliberative checks of congressional debate or judicial review, potentially suppressing dissent, enforcing ideological conformity, or reallocating resources to favor regime loyalists. Historical examples illustrate how prolonged reliance on emergency-based executive orders can erode constitutional safeguards, fostering an environment where individual rights are subordinated to the perceived necessities of state security or leader-driven agendas, ultimately diminishing public autonomy and accountability.

    Objectively, it could be perceived that we are already living under an autocratic dictatorial form of government, and have been since the founding of the nation – in a loose sense, of course.

    To continue: “…that is characterized by severe economic and social regimentation and forcible suppression of opposition.”

    Does this not currently exist? This government + central banking cartel we live under does censor opposition through “private corporation” loopholes. Free speech is silenced, those who do speak out are punished as “whistle blowers” – Edward Snowden is facing imprisonment if he was to return to America.

    Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, was detained in His Majesty’s Prison Belmarsh, a high-security prison in the UK, for a total of five years, from April 11, 2019, until his release on June 24, 2024. This duration amounts to 1,901 days, as reported by WikiLeaks. Prior to this, Assange spent seven years in self-imposed exile in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London (from June 19, 2012, to April 11, 2019), but this period is not considered imprisonment as he was not in state custody. Additionally, he was sentenced to 50 weeks in prison on May 1, 2019, for violating the UK Bail Act, which was served concurrently within his Belmarsh detention. Thus, his total time in actual prison custody was five years.

    Ross Ulbricht, the founder of the Silk Road darknet marketplace, was imprisoned from his arrest on October 1, 2013, until his release on January 21, 2025, following a full and unconditional pardon by President Donald Trump. This period spans 4,129 days, or approximately 11 years and 3.5 months. Ulbricht was sentenced on May 29, 2015, to double life imprisonment plus 40 years without the possibility of parole, but his sentence was commuted after serving just over 11 years in a federal prison in Arizona. He was guilty of creating a website for free markets to flourish using decentralized sound money.

    Things to consider:

    By what terms would any one not be in support of the common People not being taken advantage of by an Aristocrat elitist few?

    Is the contention of detractors that an elite class does not rule over the common people?

    Do we not live under rule of law created by the whim of a central planner that benefits those who create them at the cost of those who live under them?

    Upon objective consideration, it could appear to the educated observer that the United States Corporation in 2025 reflects stark similarities between that align with the dictionary definition of “fascism”

    When referring to the sponsored “Google” definition, it can only be interpreted that “fascism” is a “far-right” ideology.

    This might prompt someone wonder – what is really going on around here?

  • The Pot Boils

    While the majority of people continue to sleep in a society that is headed for certain disaster, the few that realize this trajectory are forcibly boxed in by the many that would prefer conveniences of lies over freedom.

    Costs continue to climb; regulation continues to grow along with the size of government, and the working class continue to suffer at the end of the line of it all. As the (private) central banking cartel continues to devalue the currency that is known globally as the “United States Dollar”, the people that rely on that currency choose to stay blissfully ignorant to the consequences of the actions they support due to the lies they simply believe without question.

    Uneducated politically fueled adults are online demanding an “end to farming” as it is one of the “biggest contributors to climate change”, (source: https://x.com/wideawake_media/status/1963181026840105161 ) while simultaneously failing to realize their actual existence depends on the farming they demand should be ceased – the cognitive dissonance is shocking. These same people have the full power of voting -yet another reason that a Democracy is dangerous to our Republic.

    Narratives of “green policies” and “climate emergencies” continue to amplify, increasing regulation and taxation on the people, all the while convincing people that the natural foods they eat are causing harm to the environment. The corporate government directs money toward fake meat campaigns and highly chemically processed foods while pushing the narrative that meat consumption and farming are harming the planet.

    While these narratives of “cows are bad” continue to thrive, hundred-story processing plants which emit incredible amounts of exhaust fumes continue to be subsidized by government investment and built all over the natural land. These narratives not only misleading, but dangerous to the poor and middle class: those who are effected the most.

    Al Gore and the corporate syndicate of government goonies has been declaring the world will “end in ten years” beginning nearly 30 years ago – but this dates back further – Earlier discussions of global warming—such as the 1970s scientific warnings about a “greenhouse effect” or the 1988 testimony of NASA scientist James  Ehrlich before the U.S. Senate—focused on serious risks but did not typically employ the stark “end‑the‑world” language that later became common in political rhetoric.

    To assume a “greenhouse effect” could happen in this world would be to assume we are living in a closed system. This closed system would be contrary to the official NASA stance that we live next to an open vacuum.

    Nature abhors a vacuum, and one next to an open air system is against all modern physics – so which is it? Are we boiling inside of a closed system, or do we exist next to an open vacuum? Does this open vacuum, which is supposedly 2.73  kelvin, or  ‑454.8 °F – really create an environment where the world is heating up? Is this even a possibility?

    We live in a world where narratives are floating around and no unbiased verification has taken place. NASA says we are spinning at 1040 miles per hour at the equator, that we are 92.96 million miles away from the sun, and that we are 238,855 miles away from the moon. Do your own senses tell you this is true? Does the heat of the sun feel like it is that far away? Does the cool of the moon? What about when you go higher or lower in elevation, do you notice a difference – without being told, what do you experience?

    At what point do we discontinue believing things that make no sense, simply because a government authority has told us it’s true? Can we trust a government apparatus that operates with a profit motive and has enslaved it’s people through fiat currency and central banking to achieve higher returns via more debt issuance? Can we believe the lies they have financial incentives to uphold, or do we recognize there may actually be moral hazard that exists? When do the majority of people begin to question – and dismantle – things in this society that no longer serve us, or are those of us that questioned doomed to be imprisoned at the hand of our fellow apathetic friends?

    Idiocy has become popular and “cool” in music and film culture. We glorify lack of common knowledge and create an environment where the most impressionable youth strive to act like absolutely distasteful buffoons. The corporate complex has framed sub-human behavior as something to strive for, destroying the fabric of a civilized society.

    We slowly move ever closer to a world we are not prepared to live in at the hand of the ignorant masses. Trusting a corporate narrative must be analyzed – every corporation has profit motive – nothing is said “just because”.

    Prioritize education before it’s too late: study history, learn the evils of government over reach and excessive regulation, and stand up for the Posterity.

    If we fail to act today, our children will face impossibilities we can not imagine.

  • Contracting Away Freedom

    The beautiful thing about freedom is that you are free to choose. The bad thing about freedom is that you are free to choose.

    When you are given absolute domain over your own decisions in a society which promotes freedom to choose, there is a more than zero chance that someone in that society will attempt to take advantage of you one way or another.

    In a society where freedom to contract is a foundational right, there will inevitably stem, from nefarious actors, contracts that attempt to take that freedom.

    For the aware and educated individual, these traps are not more than an inconvenience. For the under-educated and convenient-seeking individual, a signature is something to give away in exchange for material gain regardless of cost, and landing one of those signatures on the line of a contract which may take those freedoms in exchange for some material good is not trivial.

    Though simple, the point is clear: be vigilant always in your endeavors. Aligning yourself with a material symbol of status in exchange for your future value is likely not the best decision one can make today for the benefit of their future self: keeping up “with the Jones’ ” tends to work out poorly for the people attempting to keep up.

    By contracting away your future freedom and rights for a material gain today, you are certain to set yourself back. There is nearly no way to know what situation our future selves will be in. To contract away our future labor value for some arbitrary material good today is something equivalent to selling your soul for a shiny stone – though it is not exactly the same.

    In a society where the freedom to contract unlimited exists, vultures will seek and feed off the weak, and those that do not understand that the world is always going to work against them. What may be considered a “norm” in society; financing car loans, student loans, house loans, buying jewelry on credit, etc., may also be considered an attack on ones prosperity and posterity. Debt servitude is not a new concept – it is just one that effects the uneducated the most.

    Be educated, be prepared, and always stand your ground. When presented with a contract in any form, be sure to read it. Not one other soul in this world will be looking out for your future interest or your benefit. It is the duty of ourselves to study and prepare for those who wish to take everything from us – because they will, if we allow them to.

    “Our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them.” – Thomas Jefferson